“Every breath for a Black person is a grace in a world hell-bent on stealing our lives whether by actual execution or by the slow burn of dehumanization. But the awesome truth is, none of the villains in that oppression narrative are the givers of that grace. They have no real power over our breath even when trying to rob us of it. We must consciously continue to breathe because it is a demonstration of our defiance. Doing so allows us to birth ourselves over and over again, into every iteration of our people's freedom journey, and that, I suspect, must be terribly frustrating for our oppressors. And yes, be cause they are not the ones who can give us life, they absolutely have no right to steal it. Knowing this is the ultimate resistance. It is what Harriet knew. It's what Nat and Fannie Lou knew.”
— Tracey Michae’l Lewis-Giggetts, Black Joy: Stories of Resistance, Resilience, and Restoration, pp. 12-13
“At the core of homonormativity is an erotics of whiteness, which designates some bodies as undesirable, too submerged in the dirty waters of signification to rescue. This was one of the hardest lessons to learn—that a persecuted people could reinscribe the violence of ontological shaming. Judith Butler probes the limits of “outness”. “Who is represented by which use of the term (queer], and who is excluded? For whom does the term present an impossible conflict between racial, ethnic, or religious affiliation and sexual politics? What kinds of policies are enabled by what kinds of usages, and which are backgrounded or erased from view?” Queers who ride the advantageous waves of whiteness slide smoothly into the depths of the norma-tive. This is done at the expense of racial flourishing. On dating apps, where white men hide behind a veil of anonymity but discriminate out in the open, this identity crisis wages on- “NO FATS, NO FEMS, NO ASIANS” is a banner under which white men build a dystopia. I could recite the vulgar speech that's been hurled at me, but I won't. There's too much to mine in them from those who feed, like vampires, on the spoils of injurious information. Of course this doesn't negate the violence entirely—it lingers as a spectre, tied to the bank of memories we have about vicious language. Perhaps that spectre is politically volatile enough to arouse a sense of injustice to end the slow making of a queer future replete with racism. Maggie Nelson: “And what kind of madness is it anyway, to be in love with something constitutionally incapable of loving you back?” Has anyone ever managed not to mould the body into an archive of their own degradation?”
— Billy-Ray Belcourt, A History of My Brief Body, pp. 68-9
the sun was generous.
the grass didn’t mind.
but the quiet felt too practiced.
i spoke because not speaking
would have been a kind of surrender.
not to correct.
not to clarify.
but to stay present,
even when presence felt like exposure.
this is where the wealth came in.
sugar. cotton. tobacco.
extraction and enclosure made into ornament.
the names are still here—
merchant, plantation, st. vincent—
this city remembers through what it refuses to rename.
i walk this route not to map it,
but to feel where the archive ends.
my drift isn’t about finding answers.
it’s about tracking the infrastructure of forgetting.
what the buildings obscure.
what the street names naturalize.
what passes for neutral.
these façades:
they’re policy.
they’re inheritance.
they’re proof that the empire never left—
just rebranded.